Wednesday, March 15, 2006


The battle between the Mayor's office and the Auditor continued this morning on Abdul. David Brooks and Kobi "Wright" were on to talk about the recent lawsuit that was mentioned on an earlier post.

Brooks seemed to explain clearly that the Contoller's office (i.e. Mayor controlled Controller) has been performing duties that were supposed to be taken over by the Auditor's Office. "Can't tell the truth" Kobi indicated that the Auditor's office has "rebuked offers to take over the duties that are prescribed to her via the new legislation.

I think that if the Auditor had refused to take over these duties, then the Auditor would never have taken the steps to have a court rule and order those jobs moved to the Auditor's office.

Does anyone actually think that this would be a problem if the Auditor was a democrat? Maybe we should apologize to the mayor for getting in the way of him taking over the city.


At 12:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don’t you know the Democratic Party has no requirements when it comes to filling a position? The coroner is not a real doctor. Their county wide candidate for assessor isn’t even a certified assessor and their candidate for prosecutor has never stepped foot into a courtroom. Why would we think that an attorney for the mayor would know how to read and apply state law.

At 6:18 PM, Anonymous jake said...

All the better for Mayor Peterson to control them...that's why he chooses them.


Post a Comment

<< Home